TradingLoot

← Chart patterns

Double Top and Double Bottom Patterns: How to Read Them

A double top is two similar peaks after an uptrend; a double bottom is two similar lows after a downtrend. They are among the simplest reversal patterns to spot, and among the easiest to call too early. This guide explains when the shape becomes a confirmed pattern, what to watch along the way, and how the pattern can fail. For the method that applies to every pattern, see how to read any chart pattern.

Educational content only. This page explains how double tops and double bottoms are commonly read; it is not investment advice, and no chart pattern predicts or guarantees trading results. Trading carries risk of loss.

Double tops and bottoms in one minute

  • Double top: after an uptrend, a peak, a pullback, and a second peak at about the same height.
  • Double bottom: the mirror image after a downtrend, with two similar lows and a rally between them.
  • The line that matters: the low between the peaks (or the high between the lows). That level is where the pattern is confirmed.
  • Two peaks are not enough: until price breaks that level convincingly, the trend is intact and the pattern is only a possibility.
  • The caveat: a confirmed pattern can still fail, and a measured target is a reference point, not a forecast.

Where this page's information comes from

  • StockCharts' ChartSchool, its guides to the double top and double bottom reversal, for the conventions on anatomy, confirmation, volume, retests and targets. Those points are attributed in the text.
  • Thomas Bulkowski's glossary on ThePatternSite, for his definitions of pullbacks, throwbacks, the measure rule and busted patterns.
  • TradingLoot's own explanations and diagrams. They describe how the patterns are commonly read, not rules that guarantee an outcome.

This page gives no success rates or performance statistics, and it leaves out the numerical rules of thumb some sources use for spacing and size. For how Bulkowski measured these patterns, see our summary of his encyclopedia.

Anatomy of a double top

It starts with the trend. ChartSchool looks for a significant prior uptrend, and notes that many possible double tops form along the way up without ever being confirmed. Two similar highs in the middle of a range are just two highs.

In ChartSchool's description, the first peak marks the high of the trend so far and is unremarkable on its own. A trough follows. The second peak is a rally back to about the same level, where price meets resistance from the first high. Only once that resistance holds is a double top even possible, and it still isn't complete.

Double top: prior uptrend, two similar peaks, the support level between them, a break below it and the measured-move conventionAn idealised schematic, not market data. Marker 1: a rising line marks the prior uptrend. Marker 2: a first peak. Marker 3: a trough between the peaks. Marker 4: a second peak at about the same height as the first. Marker 5: a dotted support line runs through the low of the trough. Marker 6: price falls through the support line. Marker 7: a dashed bracket shows the height from the peaks to the support level, and a second bracket projects the same distance down from the break.1234567

Idealised schematic, not real market data. It has no prices, dates or timeframe.

  1. Prior uptrend: Without a trend to reverse, there is no reversal pattern.
  2. First peak: The high of the trend so far. On its own, nothing unusual.
  3. Trough: The pullback between the peaks. Its low sets the support level.
  4. Second peak: A rally back to about the same height, where price meets resistance.
  5. Support level: The line through the lowest point between the peaks, sometimes called the neckline.
  6. Support break: A convincing move below the support level. Only now is the pattern complete.
  7. Measured-move convention (dashed): The height from the peaks to support, projected down from the break. A reference point, not a forecast.

Until marker 6, two similar peaks are only a possible double top.

The peaks don't have to match exactly, and how far apart they are matters. ChartSchool cautions that peaks very close together may just reflect ordinary resistance rather than a lasting change between buyers and sellers. It also suggests studying the trough: if it drags on and struggles to rise, demand may be drying up.

The support level and confirmation

The level that decides a double top is the lowest point between the two peaks. It's often called the neckline, as in the head and shoulders, but here it's usually a single horizontal support level rather than a line joining two lows.

ChartSchool is explicit that even after price trades back down to support, the pattern and the trend reversal are still incomplete. The double top is complete only when price breaks below that support. Until then, the uptrend is intact, and two similar peaks can resolve with price simply turning higher again. Calling the top at the second peak is an easy way to misread the pattern.

Anatomy of a double bottom

The double bottom reverses the picture. ChartSchool looks for a significant prior downtrend, then a first low that marks the bottom of the decline so far, a rally, and a second decline that meets support near the first low. Even after that support holds, it says, only the possibility of a double bottom exists.

Double bottom: prior downtrend, two similar lows, the resistance level between them, a break above it and the measured-move conventionAn idealised schematic, not market data, drawn as a mirror image of the double top. Marker 1: a falling line marks the prior downtrend. Marker 2: a first low. Marker 3: a rally high between the lows. Marker 4: a second low at about the same depth as the first. Marker 5: a dotted resistance line runs through the rally high. Marker 6: price rises through the resistance line. Marker 7: a dashed bracket shows the depth from the lows to the resistance level, and a second bracket projects the same distance up from the break.1234567

Idealised schematic, not real market data. It has no prices, dates or timeframe.

  1. Prior downtrend: The double bottom needs a decline to reverse.
  2. First low: The low of the decline so far. On its own, nothing unusual.
  3. Rally high: The bounce between the lows. Its high sets the resistance level.
  4. Second low: A decline back to about the same depth, where price meets support.
  5. Resistance level: The line through the highest point between the lows, sometimes called the neckline.
  6. Resistance break: A convincing move above the resistance level. Only now is the pattern complete.
  7. Measured-move convention (dashed): The depth from the lows to resistance, projected up from the break. A reference point, not a forecast.

Until marker 6, two similar lows are only a possible double bottom.

The resistance level and confirmation

For a double bottom, the deciding level is the highest point of the rally between the two lows. ChartSchool puts it simply: the formation isn't complete until that previous reaction high is taken out, and waiting for the breakout is paramount. Before then, the downtrend is still in place, however promising the second low looks.

What counts as a convincing break varies between sources, and some apply price or time filters to screen out brief pokes through the level. The hub explains the trade-off: filters reduce false signals but mean acting later.

Volume

ChartSchool reads volume as supporting evidence at each stage of a double top. The rally to the second peak usually comes on low volume. The decline from the second peak should show expanding volume, a faster descent, or both, and it looks for the same on the break of support.

For the double bottom, ChartSchool says volume matters more than for the double top. It looks for clear evidence that volume and buying pressure are accelerating on the advance from the second low, and for increased volume or a faster ascent on the break of resistance. It also notes that rising volume on the first rally could signal early buying.

These are tendencies one source describes, not conditions every pattern meets. Treat volume as one input to weigh alongside the break of the level, not as a switch that confirms or cancels the pattern on its own.

Retests, pullbacks and throwbacks

After a break, the old level often swaps roles. ChartSchool notes that broken support becomes potential resistance in a double top, and broken resistance becomes potential support in a double bottom, and that price sometimes comes back to test it.

Bulkowski names these returns by direction. After a downward breakout, as in a double top, a return to the breakout price within 30 days is a pullback. After an upward breakout, as in a double bottom, it's a throwback. Terminology varies between sources, so check how a guide defines them.

A retest is a possibility, not a step in the pattern. Waiting for one can mean missing the move, and a return that carries back through the level isn't a retest any more: it's the start of a failed pattern.

The measured-move convention

ChartSchool's target for a double top takes the distance from the support break up to the peaks and subtracts it from the break. For a double bottom, it adds the distance from the resistance breakout down to the lows to the breakout price. Bulkowski calls this kind of calculation a measure rule, describing a minimum price move after the breakout.

Marker 7 in the first two diagrams shows the idea. It's a reference point, not a prediction of where price will go or how quickly. For why TradingLoot doesn't publish hit rates for targets, see probabilities and limits.

Similar patterns

Some other shapes share features with double tops and bottoms. These sections compare them:

False breakouts and failed patterns

A double top or bottom can go wrong at two stages. Before confirmation, the pattern simply doesn't complete: support holds and the trend carries on. That isn't a failed pattern, because there never was a confirmed one. After confirmation, price can break the level, make little progress and come back through it. That is a failed breakout.

A failed breakout of a double top: an incomplete pattern, a support break, a return above support and a possible further reversalAn idealised schematic, not market data. The left side repeats the double top. Marker 1: a bracket spans the two peaks before support breaks, which is still an incomplete pattern. Marker 2: price falls through the dotted support line. Marker 3: price rises back above the support line, so the breakout has failed. Marker 4: a dashed path shows one possible further upward reversal, rising above a dotted line at the height of the peaks.1234

Idealised schematic, not real market data. It has no prices, dates or timeframe.

  1. Incomplete pattern: Two similar peaks, but support hasn't broken yet. This is only a possible double top.
  2. Support break: The pattern now looks confirmed.
  3. Back above support: The breakout has failed.
  4. Possible further reversal (dashed): After the failed breakout, price may reverse further upward, here rising above the peaks. This resembles what Bulkowski calls a busted pattern, but the drawing doesn't establish that classification: his definition also requires the move after the breakout to stay within 10%, which can't be assessed from this schematic.

This shows one way a breakout can fail. It isn't a probability, and it doesn't mark a universal point where a reading becomes wrong. A failed double bottom is the mirror image.

A failed breakout is a broad idea. Bulkowski's busted pattern is a narrower definition: price moves no more than 10% after the breakout, then reverses and crosses the other side of the pattern, starting a trend in the new direction. So not every failed breakout is a busted pattern in his sense. For why failures still carry information, see our summary of Bulkowski's research on failure.

Textbook vs live charts

Live double tops and bottoms rarely look like the diagrams. The second peak may fall a little short of the first or slightly exceed it, the trough may be rounded or drawn out, and the support level may be a zone rather than a clean line. The shape is often obvious only after the break.

Shapes that look alike can also behave differently. Our summary of Bulkowski's encyclopedia explains that the book splits double tops and bottoms into four variants each, with a chapter for every one. That level of detail is beyond this guide, but it's a reminder not to treat every double peak as the same pattern.

In TradingLoot's view, practising on historical data with replay is a good way to test whether you would have identified the deciding level before the break, rather than afterwards.

Common misreadings

These are ways the patterns are often misread, as TradingLoot sees it.

"Two equal highs make a double top."
Not without a prior uptrend and a confirmed break of the support between them.
"The second peak is the signal."
The second peak completes the shape. The break of support is what confirms the pattern.
"Strong volume guarantees the breakout."
Volume is supporting evidence. It can strengthen a reading, but it can't guarantee one.
"The measured move tells you where price will go."
It's a convention for a rough reference point, not a forecast of distance or timing.
"A failed double top means the method is useless."
Failure is part of how any pattern behaves, and it's information in its own right.

Key takeaways

  • A double top needs a prior uptrend; a double bottom needs a prior downtrend.
  • Two similar highs or lows alone are only a possible pattern.
  • The deciding level is the low between the peaks, or the high between the lows.
  • ChartSchool treats volume as more important for double bottoms than for double tops.
  • Retests and measured moves are possibilities and conventions, not certainties.
  • A confirmed pattern can fail; a busted pattern is Bulkowski's narrower definition of one kind of failure.

Further reading

How this page was sourced

Sources were checked in October 2026. Conventions on anatomy, confirmation, volume, retests and targets come from StockCharts' ChartSchool guides to the double top reversal and the double bottom reversal. Definitions of pullbacks, throwbacks, the measure rule and busted patterns come from Thomas Bulkowski's glossary. The source's numerical rules of thumb are deliberately left out. The diagrams, the misreadings and the practical advice are TradingLoot's own. No statistics or proprietary diagrams are reproduced. See our Methodology for how we research and verify.